Calling All Angels- Finally a Real Campaign for children
There have been many dodgy campaigns in the so called “rights for children”, but are in reality only there for the sole purpose of securing the child as though they were a piece of property. Statistics can be skewed all they like, but at the end of the day most children are better off with their mothers after divorce. Nature knows it, criminologists know it and deep down we all knew it, but because the shared parenting campaign sold as well as the renown pyramid scheme – we all fell for it. Religious commentators might say that it was like scientists “playing god”, but in this case it was male supremacists, robbing motherhood. In their own sense of paranoid delusions, they thought that single motherhood was an “invasion of feminism”, but its not. Its mothers working extremely hard through all of the hate set against them to raise their children to become strong and good human beings. That is all, no matter how one tries to paint it, there is no more. Now, because children’s rights have never been so appalling along with women’s rights, mothers have embraced feminism like never before. The support every year for the white ribbon campaign grows every year and more people, whether men’s groups like it or not are beginning to see through the FRs hatred and propaganda. I can be very thankful to learn that Australians are certainly not a dumb country as much as these vial groups represent. The more violent incidents against women and children, the more people begin to know who is the real problem. The continued support by dads in distress, dads on air members and even fathers4equality of a known perpetrator is a statement in itself that reveals what this group is truly about: Its not about and never was about men’s rights – it was abusers rights. The right to conceal, the right to punish victims, the right to continue their terror unchallenged and most of all: The right to have judicial authority to continue to do this.
Know that there is indeed a war on children and motherhood.
Know that a critical mass can stop this
Know that the courts are accomplices in some of the most disgusting crimes of the century beyond 9/11 If we put all of the victims of this child and mother massacre: it would be classified as the greatest act of terror and genocide by the state and its actors.
Posted via web from australiansharedparentingdebate’s posterous
Japan and why they wont sign the hague convention
Gerald Nissenbaum, a family lawer and a columnist from the bosten herald stated:
Japanese divorce laws almost always award the kids to the mother unless she’s proven unfit. Japan also hasn’t adopted the applicable Hague Convention.
Japan is one of the few countries left on earth that honours mothers and truly appreciate the unique gift of what motherhood can provide for children. With children as men’s property back in fashion, the world has embraced a disturbing trend. Embedded within the Japanese culture are some of the most humanistic religions that do not force one to consider religious teachings without first questioning logic.
Japan has a great history of quickly embracing western ways, but not without careful consideration. Japan has promised to review whether it will sign the treaty, but aimed to investigate it properly first. Something, other governments have failed to do and have unnecessarily reacted upon pressure of angry men’s groups.
Posted via web from australiansharedparentingdebate’s posterous
Safety: They’re not asking for much
Some mothers work and some mothers spend many unpaid hours caring for their children. With the growing amount of mothers continuing in the workforce, it is obvious that child support or welfare payments were not the incentive. A majority of the working mother population use day care and after school care with the comfort knowing that the carers have been screened for a criminal background. We expect in a first world country that our children receive the highest amount of care and in most cases they do. Some of the experts caring for our children have been trained into enhancing the learning of our children, so that the time they spent away from their family is also progressive.
Posted via email from australiansharedparentingdebate’s posterous
The Politics of Child Abuse
Politics is for the present, but an equation is for eternity.
-Albert Einstein
If one were to summarise all abuse case outcomes, it would be factual to establish that child abuse is only recognised as criminal when it has not been perpetrated by the state or its actors.
In both the child protection and the family court system, cases where the government is responsible for the abuse go unchallenged by the public and independent organisations. This is because both laws surrounding children restrict publication. The argument for restriction is that it “protects” the names of the children involved. In ABCs Law Report titled “Restrictions on media coverage of child protection and family court matters“, journalists raised cases where the child abuse was not being addressed. The story with the cases and a variety of commentary provided an evidential backdrop on the reasons why suppressing deaths and abuse of children is not being protective. It highlighted how the government had misused children’s rights as a means to a political end.
The inquiry into family law was purely based on politics as most of the submissions were from men’s groups. All of these groups requested laws aligned entirely with their own interests. When groups against child abuse began to appear regularly in the Australian media spotlight, men’s groups responded with political blackmail:
I know that separated groups, fathers’ groups in particular, shared parenting groups can conjure up over a million votes and that’s something that I think the Government will take into account. – Michael Green
No doubt, that men’s groups have influenced the general population to believe that men are far more disadvantaged than children and women, that their rights must be taken into consideration above all others. This is reflected in the survey findings on community attitudes on violence against women. Some members of society even believe that it is ok to rape. It should not be a reason for politicians to see it as an opportunity to lower the rape law bar so that they can appease the growing population of rapists. There needs to be a point where popularity is not the drive for our leaders.
Posted via web from australiansharedparentingdebate’s posterous
Its not shared parenting: Its dads getting full custody
Some may wonder as to why members of the shared parenting council often celebrate, commend and applaud the removal of a mother from a child's life. That's because if they straight out said that they want all fathers to get full custody, no one would support them. Shared Parenting is merely a tool for that and does not reflect the consistency in care that was provided for the children before separation. Shared Parenting is a pathway for full custody.
Posted via email from australiansharedparentingdebate’s posterous
Why Shared Parenting is Extremely Selfish
A great amount of disinformation is going around stating that those who reject shared parenting for children are “selfish”. In this article there are several key points where this notion is clearly not true.
Peace For Women and Children
So much has been written about what women and children don’t want. The purposes of this article is to write about what we do want. Peace sometimes can be confused with passiveness. That is not real peace. Real peace is without oppression, hate and violence. If peace were an ideal, the declaration of human rights would not have been realised. It would have gone down in history as a collective”pipe dream”. Awards for the nobel peace prize would never have been given. It is a reality that everyday, there are people working towards bringing out true peace to all people.
True reason for problems of "fatherless" children
Australia’s Family Court Triage System
We don’t get much news on the Family Court because of the secrecy provisions. Few researchers are allowed access to court records. Fewer statistics are made publicly available and are often selective no different than the climate deniers research where years were purposely removed to convey propaganda. What we do know is that there is a very small portion of children being protected from child abuse and an even smaller portion of women protected from family violence. “No Contact” cases are as low as 6%, despite 98.5% of fatal crimes committed against children were by a family member.
The Family Court Could Save Lives
Asia (from left), Jarius and Grace Osborne with their grandmother. The family wants the children returned to the Waikato for burial. (source: nz herald)
A recent tragedy in Melbourne could have been avoided, but victims of family violence know that they cannot be protected by the courts. Only a tiny fraction of family violence victims were given the grace to go into hiding and provide a stable upbringing for their children.
“My heart breaks because . . . he had tried to commit suicide with an overdose of tablets (six months ago). Weren’t they concerned about the welfare of the three children if the father was doing that?”
“I was threatened from him. He had threatened me when I moved to Australia that if I was to take the children back to New Zealand – he took their passports, everything away from me,”
In some cases, emergency court proceedings have been made to protect children and others have been made to pursue children when the parent has absconded with the child. When this mother raised this with the police six months ago, an emergency order could have been made.